Quant

Today's state: Quant is trading at $68.98 with a $1.0 billion market capitalization (rank #76). The price moved +1.13% over the past 24 hours and is +2.82% over 7 days; the 30-day move stands at +0.00% and the 90-day at -8.48%.

Position vs cycle: Sitting more than 70% under its prior cycle high, the asset is deep in post-peak drawdown territory — a zone associated with late-stage bear phases or a permanent downward re-rating.

Volatility and structure: 30-day realized volatility of 54.6% annualized is moderate for an asset this size. Our composite multi-horizon Price Strength reads Bearish (39/100), against a weakening multi-horizon backdrop with cumulative pressure across 30/90-day windows.

Looking past Bitcoin alone, how closely QNT tracks the next two biggest layer-1s over 90 days indicates whether it is mostly market beta or something more independent. The daily-log-return correlations:

• Bitcoin reference: +0.39 — a weak positive relationship.
• Ethereum reference: +0.40 — a weak positive relationship.
• Solana reference: +0.38 — a weak positive relationship.

When an asset correlates strongly with multiple majors, it is trading largely as market beta — the big caps set the direction and standalone outperformance is elusive. Weak or negative correlations instead signal idiosyncratic forces (its own news, sector rotation, narrative changes) capable of producing returns the broader market does not share.

Quant (QNT) is a cryptocurrency, traded on global digital-asset markets. It trades at $68.98 as of the latest update, with a 24-hour move up 1.13%, placing it at rank #76 by market capitalisation among all listed digital assets. Quant's current market cap stands at $1.03B, a figure used by traders, analysts and institutional desks to gauge relative liquidity and risk exposure across the crypto market.

On this page you'll find a live, daily-refreshed dashboard tracking Quant across multiple data sources — price history going back several years, on-chain activity where available, fundamentals like circulating supply and dilution, top exchanges by volume, technical analysis using moving averages and RSI, and an algorithmic short, mid and long-term forecast. All figures are pulled from public APIs and cached locally; nothing here is investment advice.

Quant focuses on connecting blockchains. As liquidity and applications fragment across many chains, Quant provides the rails to move value and data between them, with the token underpinning that infrastructure.

Quant currently ranks #76 by market capitalisation, making it a top-100 asset. Its focus is enterprise interoperability, and launched in 2018. Essentially all of the QNT supply is already issued — roughly 14.88M of a 14.88M cap are in circulation — so future inflation is a non-factor. It currently trades about 84% below its all-time high of $426.18 set in September 2021.

Quant operates cross-chain infrastructure: validators, relayers, or a messaging protocol verify events on one chain and reproduce them on another, with the token used as collateral, governance, or fees. Because bridges concentrate value in transit, their security model is the single most important property — historically the most-exploited surface in all of crypto.

Quant currently ranks #76 by market capitalisation, making it a top-100 asset. Its focus is enterprise interoperability, and launched in 2018. Essentially all of the QNT supply is already issued — roughly 14.88M of a 14.88M cap are in circulation — so future inflation is a non-factor. It currently trades about 84% below its all-time high of $426.18 set in September 2021.

The main uses of Quant are moving assets and messages across chains, supplying liquidity to bridge routes, and governing or securing the protocol. Its traction is best read as the share of cross-chain volume it captures versus rival bridges.

Daily turnover is light — roughly 0.85% of market cap ($8.70M over 24 hours) — so larger orders are best worked into the market gradually to limit slippage.

The supply story for Quant comes down to three things: how tokens are issued over time, how many are circulating now, and how far the fully-diluted valuation sits above the circulating market cap. At over 99% of maximum supply issued, future issuance pressure is effectively zero — the supply curve is now flat, and value accrual must come from network adoption rather than from supply schedule mechanics.

For thesis-building, the relevant question is whether the structural value-accrual mechanism (fee burns, staking-yield reinvestment, deflationary supply mechanics, ecosystem TVL growth) outpaces the structural emission pressure. When it does, the price tends to grind higher over multi-quarter windows even without speculative momentum; when it does not, the asset typically requires consistent narrative-driven demand to absorb the issuance.

The macro backdrop for crypto assets is dominated by the Federal Reserve's rate path, the trajectory of dollar liquidity, and the unwind (or non-unwind) of the post-2020 expansion in M2 money supply. Crypto — Bitcoin in particular — has historically responded most strongly to shifts in the global liquidity regime, with risk-on phases coinciding with falling real yields and a softening dollar, and risk-off phases the inverse.

Several traditional markets serve as useful cross-checks: a strong dollar (DXY) has tended to weigh on crypto; rising 10-year Treasury yields raise the cost of holding risk; gold occasionally trades as a parallel hard-money hedge; and US equities frequently move in sympathy with crypto when the driver is liquidity rather than fundamentals.

Zooming in on Quant, the most reliable leading indicator has tended to be crypto-native liquidity itself — aggregate stablecoin supply, open interest in futures, and exchange volume. Rising on-chain liquidity has historically pulled QNT up; draining liquidity has done the opposite. With a comparatively loose 90-day BTC correlation of +0.39, QNT has shown more idiosyncratic price behaviour than the average large-cap — its own catalysts can matter as much as the broad liquidity tide.

Bridge-specific risks are severe: cross-chain bridges have suffered some of the largest exploits in crypto history, because a single contract or validator-set compromise can drain assets in transit. Add competition from rival bridges, smart-contract risk, and the centralisation many bridge designs still carry. Treat the security track record as the primary diligence item.