Logan Paul Lawsuit: Latest Updates and Legal Details

In early 2025, Logan Paul found himself embroiled in a significant defamation lawsuit. He publicly alleged that Matchroom Boxing had bribed judge Glenn Feldman during two high-profile bouts—Katie Taylor vs. Amanda Serrano and Usyk vs. Joshua—claims which prompted a $100 million suit. Despite refusing to retract his statement, legal back-and-forth ensued until March 18, 2025, when all parties reached a settlement. The case was officially dismissed with prejudice on March 31, 2025, meaning it cannot be reopened. A legal close to a heated chapter, for sure.
(timesofindia.indiatimes.com)

CryptoZoo Saga: Dismissal After Investor Backlash and Refund Program

Logan Paul’s CryptoZoo NFT project was a rollercoaster. Launched in 2021 as a fun, Pokémon-esque game, it quickly unraveled. Critics and early backers accused the project of being a rug pull, and a class-action lawsuit was filed in 2023. Paul responded: he offered partial refunds through a buy-back initiative—provided claimants agreed not to sue.
(en.wikipedia.org)

By October 30, 2025, both magistrate and district judges dismissed the class-action suit, ruling there was insufficient evidence that Paul misled or defrauded users. His statement that “no reasonable juror could find Logan’s statements misleading or fraudulent” underscores the legal clarity of the ruling.
(dexerto.com)

He took to YouTube to celebrate the verdict, calling it vindication. In his words:

“There’s a huge difference between failure and fraud.”
(ringsidenews.com)

Beyond that sentiment, many of the 140 investors who pursued action had declined the buy-back offer, opting for lawsuit instead—and ultimately lost.
(ringsidenews.com)

Auction Antics: The Bulls Court Floor Lawsuit That Vanished

Another legal skirmish involved a unique memorabilia—Logan Paul bid over $560,000 for a section of the Chicago Bulls’ court, signed by Michael Jordan. He suspected authenticity issues and filed suit against Heritage Auctions in September 2025, accusing them of denying him reasonable vetting rights before payment.
(dallasnews.com)

Yet by mid-November 2025, the case was dismissed without prejudice—meaning Paul could technically refile. Heritage maintained the item’s authenticity, backed by recognized third-party sources such as Upper Deck, Beckett, and PSA.
(dallasnews.com)

WWE, Prime, and Collateral Stories: Business Moves and Conflicts

Not all of Logan Paul’s legal matters ended in courtrooms. He signed on as a full-time performer with WWE in January 2026, expressing excitement at becoming “the best wrestler, husband, father, and business partner” he could be.
(cagesideseats.com)

On the business front, his brand Prime Hydration faced legal turbulence too—a $68 million suit from a manufacturer in 2024 claimed breach of contract. In another skirmish, rival drink brand Mas+ (founded by Lionel Messi) alleged anti-competitive behavior; Paul counter-sued. Messi’s bodyguard even offered to step into the ring to settle it.
(nypost.com)

Summary of Legal Highlights

• Matchroom Defamation Suit (2025): Settled and dismissed with prejudice.
• CryptoZoo Class-Action (2025): Dismissed; court found no evidence of fraud.
• Heritage Auction Dispute (2025): Dismissed without prejudice; authenticity contested.
• Prime Hydration & Rival Brand Lawsuits: Ongoing business-related disputes.
• WWE Contract (2026): Logan transitions to a major role in sports entertainment.

What to Watch Next

• Will the Heritage lawsuit resurface later? Dismissal without prejudice leaves the door open.
• Legal tangles with Prime Hydration may continue, especially in the context of competitive brand action.
• Having cleared the CryptoZoo court case, Logan may now pivot fully into his WWE path—less legal drama, more body slams.

Concluding Thoughts

Logan Paul’s legal journey has been a tangled web—from defamation bowling match, NFT disaster, to auction floor battles. Yet, a common theme persists: many cases ended in his favor through dismissal or settlement. Those decisions didn’t just reflect courtroom outcomes; they also shaped his public narrative—highlighting resilience, savvy legal strategy, and, at times, sheer controversy. With his WWE full-time contract now underway, the squares of courtroom and ring seem moving past each other—towards a new chapter where legal battles may give way to sports spectacles.

Let’s see if the courtroom becomes encore, or if WWE reigns supreme from here on out.